Criticism

“If you’re not your own worst critic, you’re probably not very good.”

This is a quote I’ve been telling people for years, though in all honesty it’s always been more of a reminder to myself than anything else. I started saying it when I was in school, surrounded by creative people for the first time, watching how everyone handled — or didn’t handle — feedback on their work. The results were pretty telling.

A reminder that perfection in the hearts of creators is unattainable, including my own, but that’s the point. While the end product is what everyone sees, it’s the effort to reach that end product — perfect or not — that is important, and often the harder part. Did I do everything I could within the constraints of time, tools, and money? Great, then the product is finished. Finished is more important than perfect and they are never the same thing.

But on the journey to finished, criticism — self-imposed or otherwise — plays a key role. And how you handle it says a lot about where your work is going to end up.

The Filter

Here’s what I actually believe about criticism: all of it has value, but not in the way people usually mean when they say that. The value isn’t in the criticism itself — it’s in your ability to receive it, process it, and decide what to do with it. Even bad criticism is useful if it teaches you to recognize bad criticism. Trash feedback, processed and identified as trash, still sharpens your internal standard. It still made you think.

The only criticism that is ultimately going to move the needle is your own — your internal voice, your standard for your own work. But that internal voice can and should be informed by what other people bring you. It’s a little like the idea that you can’t change people, people have to want to change themselves. Nobody else’s criticism is going to fix your work. But the right criticism, received by someone with a functioning internal standard, can help them fix it themselves.

I watched this play out clearly when I was in school. Most people were either too inexperienced to give useful feedback or too polite to give honest feedback. But when an instructor did offer real criticism, the responses split pretty cleanly. Some people received it, processed it, did something with it. Others dismissed it — not out loud necessarily, but you could tell. In their minds they were above it. And without fail, the work that stood out at the end tended to come from the people who had actively invited input and done something with what they received. The people most convinced of their own talent were often the least equipped to develop it.

Audience Changes Everything

There’s one more dimension to this worth naming, especially for anyone making things in creative industries: there’s a meaningful difference between art made for yourself and art made for an audience, and the rules are genuinely different.

If you’re making something purely for yourself, your internal standard is the only one that matters. Criticism is optional. Someone not connecting with your work is irrelevant. You can have your cake and eat it too when you’re the only one in the room with the cake.

The moment you want an audience — the moment you’re asking other people to spend time, money, and emotional energy on what you made — you’ve entered a different contract. Their experience of your work is now part of the work, whether you like it or not. That’s not a betrayal of your creative vision. It’s just being honest about what you’re making and who it’s for.

In creative fields where the end product is meant to be experienced by other people — games, film, music, design — the people who treat criticism as an attack on their intent tend to struggle. The people who treat it as information about how their work is actually landing tend to get better. Not because they abandon what they’re trying to do, but because they understand that what they intended and what the audience received are two different things, and closing that gap is part of the craft.

Being your own worst critic means holding yourself to a standard. But a standard informed by nothing is just an opinion. Let the feedback in. Process it. Decide what it’s worth. Then get back to work.


by

Tags: